在 2020年6月6日週六 11:03，Warin <[email protected]> 寫道：
> On 6/6/20 8:02 am, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > I need to reopen this thread. > > > > I do object strongly to the invitation to remove the > > razed/dismantled-railway tag in the case of railway tracks have been > > replaced by roads with the same geometry. To the contrary this is one > > of the more fortunate cases where the original route has been > > conserved, and it is easy to travel along a historical railroad. > > I admit that I have a faible for industrial archeology (like former > > railways, watermills, old canals) but they do have touristic value and > > for that reason should be in OSM. > > > As a general tourist I would have no interest in traveling along a > railway route here nothing remains of the railway. > OSM is not *only* for general tourist. > If something remains then map the remains, not the bits that no longer > exist. > As repeatedly covered in this thread with examples being cited, a razed/dismantled railway could still leave indication for its railroad alignment on the ground. Where an old railway route passes through private residential houses, > commercial buildings, car parking area .. I don't think that should be > in OSM yet people map it... > You can have rows of private houses and blocks of factories building over former railway yet the railway remain can still be visible on the ground. A historian/archeologist may have interest in documenting the old > railway route and facilities, they can and should use OHM. > They're not historical, they're currently existing as remain, and is of interest for anyone trying to understand or utilize such area. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
