On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 14:22, Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote:
> My point was only that we should be carefully looking for variants of the > concept, and try to make it mappable, avoiding too specialized tags. > Something like "milk collection point" would comprise both if we were to > distinguish active from historic ones. > It depends if we're tagging function or form or trying to handle both. I have no objection to a milk_collection_point tag (or collection_point=milk) or whatever, as additional information but I'd like to have a tag for the physical form of these stands. In the UK, these are no longer used, or no longer used for their original purpose. So man_made=milk_churn_stand + disused=yes is a better fit than just amenity = milk_collection_point + disused=yes because the latter on its own is just mapping history. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
