On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 21:17, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 29. Jun 2020, at 12:18, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I think it's better to have some kind of high level tag like > amenity=drinks or shop=drinks which you order at a counter (as opposed to > shop=beverages which is more a shop that has pre-made bottled drinks which > you walk around and add to your shopping basket). > > > > The "bubble_tea" part should be left as the cuisine. > > > I don’t believe it is helpful to cluster all kind of places where you can > primarily find something to drink in a generic tag. Bubble tea is very > specific, and unless you want bubble tea you would not want to find these > when you are thirsty. We already do distinguish places to drink with > various tags like bar, cafe, pub, and it does not seem likely that we will > deprecate these, so a amenity=drinks or shop=drinks would not promise more > consistency or ease of tagging. We also already have shop=wine, > shop=beverages and more. I would make bubble_tea a first level tag > (or maybe a subtag for pastry/sweets etc.) > So we have a first level tag for fruit_tea, purple_yogurt, milk_tea, bubble_tea, fresh_squeezed_juice, blended_juice, milkshake, smoothie? It's too long tail and breaks down when you have a shop that sells a mixture of those instead of just one, a single primary tag for all of these is better. The same way we just have amenity=restaurant and don't have amenity=pizza_restaurant etc. The same way a place that mostly does chocolate drinks that you sit down at and also does desserts is amenity=cafe + cuisine=chocolate, even if there is no coffee sold.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
