On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 22:21, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why cuisine=* rather than drink:*=yes for chocolate drinks?  I consider
> cuisine
> to apply to food, not beverages.  Soup and ice cream are edge cases, but
> chocolate
> drinks don't count as food as far as I'm concerned.
>

Sorry I wasn't aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drink, that
makes a lot of sense.

As an aside, it might make sense then to use drink:*= as the kind of drink
(chocolate) and cuisine=* to refer to the style/way it is prepared.

So a place that does the thick and rich italian hot chocolate would be
amenity=cafe + cusine=italian + drink:chocolate=designated (designated
means it's actually signposted as a chocolate cafe rather than just
happening to have chocolate on the menu but not the main item).

A place that does japanese style matcha drinks would be amenity=cafe +
cuisine=japanese + drink:matcha=designated.

On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 22:45, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> what I wrote was that I believe subtagging is an option, but that it will
> / should not be a subtag for a (yet to introduce according to you) tag
> shop=drinks
>
> We will not get main tags for purple yoghurt or fruit tea, because there
> aren’t such places (at least I have never heard of places specializing in
> these, unlike bubble tea, which apparently is a thing).
>

Rice yoghurt ->
https://www.sbs.com.au/food/article/2020/02/06/are-rice-yoghurt-drinks-new-drink-craze

Fruit Tea -> https://yifangfruitt.com/

Only just scratching the surface with all the local variations of drinks
around the world.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to