Maybe. I would be interested in specific
proposals.
14 Jul 2020, 14:24 by vosc...@gmail.com:
> I am not a land cover expert, but have come across a great number of
> obviously wrong land cover tagging in OSM.
> Said this, why not try to use CORINE [1] definitions?
>
> [1] >
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coordination_of_Information_on_the_Environment
>
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, 11:52 Christoph Hormann, <> o...@imagico.de> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > Joseph Eisenberg <>> joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com>> > hat am 13. Juli 2020
>> > um 22:34 geschrieben:
>> >
>> > >> https://www.flickr.com/photos/chrishunkeler/32097822997
>> >
>>
>> I think this is a great example why more specific tags are advisable to use
>> in OSM than a generic bare ground tag.
>>
>> What this picture shows is commonly known as desert pavement:
>>
>> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert_pavement
>>
>> Apart from varying in size distribution and density as well as material of
>> the stones these form a fairly characteristic surface that can and should be
>> mapped distinctly. As size of the larger stones strongly affects
>> navigability, specifying that would be a valuable supplemental tag.
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Hormann
>> >> http://www.imagico.de/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
