bicycle=leave Vr gr Peter Elderson
Op wo 22 jul. 2020 om 17:36 schreef Tod Fitch <t...@fitchfamily.org>: > > > On Jul 22, 2020, at 8:09 AM, Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote: > > If this unfortunate tagging practice really needs to be preserved (the > idea of retagging so many bicycle=no ways is certainly daunting) then I'd > suggest a new key, dismounted_bicycle=*, which will function as a > regulation key (like smoking=*) rather than a vehicle access key. Total > bicycle prohibition would be encoded with both bicycle=no and > dismounted_bicycle=no, and other dismounted_bicycle=* values can be > developed for whatever the regulations are in particular situations. > > Why? The suggestion that all the places that properly tagged bicycles=no > now need to be revisited and have a new dismounted_bicycles=no tag added > implies that the people who took “no” to mean something other than “no” > prevail and the rest of us have to go back and re-tag things. > > Since many miles/kilometers of ways will need to be retagged either way, > why not go with the straight forward “no means no” and “dismount means > dismount”? Makes a lot more sense to me that “no only really means no if > there is an additional dismounted_bicycle=no” tag too. > > Cheers! > > —Tod > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
