On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 6:13 AM Jan Michel <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 07.08.20 23:36, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> On 7. Aug 2020, at 19:12, Paul Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I feel like a data consumer unable to deal with access tagging is > already broken in advance. > > although we already use access like tags for parkings it should be noted > that being allowed to access is different to being allowed to park, in > general. > > The only use of an amenity=parking is to park there, so there is no > other access that we have to consider. The situation may be different > for ways and streets on the parking lot, but these are tagged separately > anyhow. If the whole area is also used for other purposes (like street > markets), then this is tagged on a spearate object with separate access > tags. > Which honestly makes me surprised we have two separate amenities for parking already, since amenity=parking, access=no, bicycle=designated would be equivalent to amenity=bicycle_parking, and would make it easier to describe unusual parking situations (like a parking area that only allowed bicycles and buses to park) more intuitively.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
