And we have at least three amenity tags for parkings amenity=parking amenity=bicycle_parking amenity=motorcycle_parking
Aug 8, 2020, 19:10 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > > >> On 8. Aug 2020, at 17:58, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >> >> Which honestly makes me surprised we have two separate amenities for parking >> already, since >> amenity=parking>> , >> access=no>> , >> >> bicycle=designated>> would be equivalent to >> amenity=bicycle_parking>> , >> and would make it easier to describe unusual parking situations (like a >> parking area that only allowed bicycles and buses to park) more intuitively. >> > > > this tagging would probably exclude pedestrians from walking through the > parking. It is also inconsistent with the definition of amenity=> parking: “> > A place for parking cars“ > It seems pointless to discuss these hypothetical alternative tagging > definitions when we all know that if is very unlikely that the definition of > a well established tag will be changed completely. > > > Cheers Martin >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
