Didn't we have an OSM tool in the past that showed points with broken links? (Also I think the citations I've given earlier a few hours ago should clear up what should or should not be deleted - by policy they _should_ delete the lower quality image if a better quality image is also available)
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 8:49 PM Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 19:39, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> > wrote: > >> >> In practice you need horrific image quality, >> to the point of unasibility for deletion to >> succeed >> > > So maybe the chance of deletion is low enough that we can drop the > argument that "wikimedia might delete it" when discussing using > wikimedia images. > >> >> They have backlog of copyright violations, >> and tricky cases where legality is not clear. >> > > Ah, in that case we might need a bot that works in the other direction. > Not one that tells wikimedia we've used one of its images but one > that tells us that one of the wikimedia images we used has gone. > > People making backlog worse by making >> such "low quality, delete" would not be >> appreciated or encouraged there >> > > We don't appreciate or encourage people who make ill-judged > edits to the map, but it happens. > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging