"by policy they _should_ delete the lower quality image if a better quality image is also available"only when it is an exact duplicate - not just photo of the same object
Aug 26, 2020, 21:45 by [email protected]: > Didn't we have an OSM tool in the past that showed points with broken links? > (Also I think the citations I've given earlier a few hours ago should clear > up what should or should not be deleted - by policy they _should_ delete the > lower quality image if a better quality image is also available) > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 8:49 PM Paul Allen <> [email protected]> > wrote: > >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 19:39, Mateusz Konieczny <>> >> [email protected]>> > wrote: >> >>> >>> In practice you need horrific image quality, >>> to the point of unasibility for deletion to >>> succeed >>> >> >> So maybe the chance of deletion is low enough that we can drop the >> argument that "wikimedia might delete it" when discussing using >> wikimedia images. >> >>> >>> They have backlog of copyright violations, >>> and tricky cases where legality is not clear. >>> >> >> Ah, in that case we might need a bot that works in the other direction. >> Not one that tells wikimedia we've used one of its images but one >> that tells us that one of the wikimedia images we used has gone. >> >> >>> People making backlog worse by making >>> such "low quality, delete" would not be >>> appreciated or encouraged there >>> >> >> We don't appreciate or encourage people who make ill-judged >> edits to the map, but it happens. >> >> -- >> Paul >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
