I added that it's not needed for ferries in the proposal on the wiki. It's alright if we have more than 1 way to do it and leave it up to the mapper to decide whether to map as a single route relation or split them and use a superroute relation.
If I start doing a bicycle tour, I want to know in advance if I'll be able to cycle the whole stretch, or if there will be waiting time for other means of transportation. I would also like to know if there will be a fee to pay for these means of transportation and whether it's necessary to hurry, in case there is only 1 per x hours, or they don't function at night. By using separate route relations, it becomes possible to add opening hours and a frequency/period on them. Jo On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:52 AM Peter Elderson <[email protected]> wrote: > 'transport' role, 'transportation' role ... is this in use and > documented somewhere? > > In bicycle routes, when the ways are different for the two directions, > forward and backward roles apply to the ways in the relation. If a > transfer/transport/transportation is to be applied as well, how would you > combine this? Multiple roles are currently not defined. > > Vr gr Peter Elderson > > > Op ma 31 aug. 2020 om 08:16 schreef Warin <[email protected]>: > >> On 31/8/20 8:25 am, Volker Schmidt wrote: >> > Keep it simple, if the simple solution does not limit you. >> > >> >> Agreed. I see no reason why a way as a member of a simple route relation >> could not have the role 'transport'. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
