I saw your changes... LGTM. Thanks! It would be great to have a page to document your proposal. Cheers Francesco
Il dom 30 ago 2020, 12:03 Jo <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Hi Francesco, > > I will create the superroute and route relations as an example. If you > don't like the solution, feel free to remove those relations again > afterwards. I will only fix a small error in the original relation, but > keep it for now, so both solutions can be analysed next to each other. > > I don't really like the idea of a role 'transfer' on all those railway > ways in a single route relation. In the case of your example, there is only > a single railway, but in theory there could be one for each direction of > travel of the train. So if you want to describe that in the route relation, > you would need role forward/backward in the route relation, which cannot be > combined with role transfer. > > Jo > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 11:24 AM Francesco Ansanelli <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear Polyglot, >> >> it sounds good to me. But what roles do you suggest for such superroute? >> Many thanks >> Francesco >> >> Il giorno dom 30 ago 2020 alle ore 11:00 Jo <[email protected]> ha >> scritto: >> >>> How would you feel about mapping it with a superroute relation? >>> >>> The superroute would then contain 3 route relations. >>> >>> 1 for the first part by bicycle >>> 1 for the middle part by train >>> 1 for the last part by bicycle >>> >>> If we give the train part a different role in the superroute, we can >>> make it such that the continuity line in JOSM is still drawn. >>> >>> This solution might also work to indicate that certain parts of a >>> bicycle route need to be done on foot. Although creating separate route >>> relations for such short stretches may feel like overkill. >>> >>> The other 'interruption' of a bicycle route I can think of, is where a >>> ferry needs to be taken. In theory this could also be a funicular. In >>> Antwerpen there is a special bus service that takes cyclists through a >>> tunnel under river Schelde (for commuters, where a ferry was abolished, >>> it's unlikely we'll create a route relation for this, but not >>> impossible/unthinkable). >>> >>> In JOSM PT_Assistant there will soon be a convenience button to extract >>> route relations from route or superroute relations, to make a conversion >>> from route to superroute+route relations easier to do. >>> >>> Polyglot >>> >>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 9:59 AM Francesco Ansanelli <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> a new example that could benefit of this proposal: >>>> >>>> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10605853 >>>> >>>> Can someone please go ahead and make a proposal? >>>> >>>> Many thanks >>>> Best regards >>>> Francesco >>>> >>>> Il mer 24 giu 2020, 23:25 Peter Elderson <[email protected]> ha >>>> scritto: >>>> >>>>> For the record, I think a transfer role is a generic solution for the >>>>> issue raised here, applicable to the cable car transfer and other types of >>>>> transfer in routes, but I will not propose a new role value any time soon. >>>>> >>>>> Anyone who wants to do it has my support, though. >>>>> >>>>> Vr gr Peter Elderson >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Op za 20 jun. 2020 om 09:13 schreef Martin Koppenhoefer < >>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> sent from a phone >>>>>> >>>>>> > On 20. Jun 2020, at 01:58, Warin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Normal OSM access is assumed to be access=yes, where some access is >>>>>> restricted then in OSM it should be marked *=no. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> for roads access=yes is assumed, it is not necessarily the default >>>>>> for all kind of features. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers Martin >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Tagging mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
