Am Di., 15. Sept. 2020 um 10:34 Uhr schrieb Tobias Zwick <o...@westnordost.de >:
> I was under the impression that the wiki already defined it like 2). > If it were like this it would be fortunate, because we already have nearly 1,9 million highways tagged with "width", and if we could reasonably expect that these are following the definition, we would maybe not have to resort to yet another key like width:carriageway Looking at width tag variants: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=width here are those with more than 1K uses (ignoring yh:WIDTH which is leading even before the main tag, but clearly not a recommendable format for tags, as it isn't self explaining and has uppercase letters, and ignoring those that do not seem to refer to roads): cycling_width cycleway:est_width shoulder:width width:lanes width:street sidewalk:width sidewalk:right:width width:lanes:forward and backward cycleway:width crossing:width cycleway:left:width sidewalk:left:width width:shoulder sidewalk:both:width width:average Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
