Jo:
Are they really people who see the tag man_made and go:
Oh, women didn't contribute to this! The tag says so...
The same people that think that man_made=manhole* implies access:women=no
But i guess that would become human_made=humanhole
We will also have to make it healthcare=midhuman
Isn't it obvious that man in this case stands for its original meaning: Mensch, ser
humano, etc?
Changing it in the database is trivially easy. Letting everyone who uses OSM data
know and give them a chance to adapt to the change, not so much.
Polyglot
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 10:16 AM Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com
<mailto:skqu...@rushpost.com>> wrote:
On 10/18/20 16:04, Oliver Simmons wrote:
> Doing this would make over 3M objects have their date updated to the
> present, when the last meaningful change may have been over 5 years ago.
> It creates the illusion of data being up-to-date when all that was
> changed was a tag key.
+1
In addition to this, it increases revision and changeset counts needlessly.
--
Shawn K. Quinn <skqu...@rushpost.com <mailto:skqu...@rushpost.com>>
http://www.rantroulette.com <http://www.rantroulette.com>
http://www.skqrecordquest.com <http://www.skqrecordquest.com>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Niels Elgaard Larsen
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
