On 24-10-2020 22:27, Allroads wrote:> Use area:highway for polygon and parking!
I will clarify the relation of our proposal to area:highway, thanks for pointing it out. In brief, the two tagging methods coexist and complement each other. Our proposal focuses on the parking-amenity (and thus amenity=parking) aspect of these street-side parking areas. Anyone mapping with area:highway can of course use amenity=parking|parking=street_side, and either: * include the parking areas within a area:highway=residential or similar; * use area:highway=service; * or not include them within the highway area and leave them as-is. What the right approach is, is probably beyond the scope of our proposal, and should be discussed within the scope of the area:highway proposals instead. I think it suffices to say that amenity=parking|parking=street_side complements area:highway mapping if applied, but doesn't require it. > For me, the value "parking_space" what key, single space problem must > be fixed first to say something about "street_side". As it comes to a vote. Could you elaborate? amenity=parking_space can be used as usual within amenity=parking. This of course also works with amenity=parking/parking=street_side: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/849745989 Our proposal doesn't affect the documented use of amenity=parking_space; you would use it just the same as with parking=surface. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
