Am Mi., 28. Okt. 2020 um 12:35 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
> access=no should be enough, if parking searcher is not handling > access=no/access=private > it is broken anyway > these areas are usually not access=no, there will be no parking / stopping signs, but otherwise these are "normal" areas where other activities (like walking, playing with a ball, etc.) will take place. Think of it as part of the building regulation picture. The precise requirements may also depend on the vehicles and equipment that is used by the local fire station. Usually these are defined during the process of getting building permission (speaking about Germany here), where you have to present the project also to the fire department, and they can tell their objections and add requirements (you do not have to have these areas, it all depends on the individual project, and guaranteeing accessibility for fire fighters and their vehicles and equipment). For example requirements will tell how much load the area must be able to carry, how wide and height access roads have to be, ecc. and individually, where and if you have to provide these areas, how they have to be marked, etc. here's an example of signposted areas: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-gNFFj27hLg4/T9ET3pVtdfI/AAAAAAAAA1A/3n5SZnT2_0Q/s1600/460280_322434661165880_471895782_o.jpg https://www.feuerwehr-neuried.de/?a=freie_fahrt_fuer_die_feuerwehr Here's an example requirement definition from Munich: https://www.muenchen.de/rathaus/dam/jcr:89f1f227-a071-4efa-ab22-1afa11e3f78b/Antrag_F_Schlie%C3%9Fung_Objekte_ohne_BMZ_20160525.pdf Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging