I also think the *electricity:grid=yes/no/backup* and
*electricity:generator=yes/no/backup* tags are clearer and would allow
for off-grid buildings to be tagged more distinctly.
The electricity tag isn't used a lot yet. I have no experience with
automated or semi-automated edits, but perhaps changing electricity=none
and electricity=grid to electricity:grid=yes would be relatively
straightforward? (This is unfortunately the problem with people adding
major undiscussed/proposed tags to the main wiki. Especially
power_supply is frustrating. )
What do others think about the tag options
electricity:grid=yes/no/backup
electricity:generator=yes/no/backup
electricity=yes
electricity=no
[electricity=yes would be used when grid or generator is unknown]
instead of
electricity=grid
electricity=generator
electricity=yes
electricity=no
Cheers Lukas
On 03/11/2020 21:20, Andrew Harvey wrote:
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 at 00:13, Lukas Richert <lrich...@posteo.de
<mailto:lrich...@posteo.de>> wrote:
Hi,
While the original proposal did specify that generators are
usually diesel, broadening the definition would only lead to a
loss of detail, but the tagging would still be correct. I'm
hesitant to use *offgrid* as a building that has, for example, a
grid connection with solar panels on the roof would then be tagged
as *electricity=grid;offgrid* instead of
*electricity=grid;generator*. The former is illogical.
However, I don't have any experience in developing countries: is
it easier to verify if something is off-grid compared to if it is
connected to a generator? And, would it be necessary to
differentiate between local grids (i.e. 2-3 generators, no
substations, transfromers, etc.) and national grids? Perhaps then
a network tag would be useful, i.e. network=national, local,
regional similar to the way cycle networks are mapped?
A further suggestion was to change the tagging
to***electricity:grid=yes/no/backup* and/or
*electricity:generator=yes/no/backup*. This might be less
ambiguous for tagging amenities or buildings that get electricity
from both sources and would then be more consistent with tagging
such as *electricity:generator:origin=diesel* when, e.g. a
building has a backup diesel generator but is connected to the
grid. Unfortunately, it would then not be consistent with the use
by the Healthsites Mapping Project, although this already has the
inconsistent *electricity=none* tag which should probably be
changed directly to *electricity=no.*
Here is the link to that suggestion I made
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/electricity#multiple_values and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/electricity#origin_of_different_sources
The whole point of the proposal process is to identify these potential
issues, resolve them, and get community agreement. If the goal is just
to implement someone else's standard then we can't use the wisdom of
the community here to improve the tag, therefore I'm not too fussed
about making this match what another project is using, instead we
should aim to have the best tags and documentation as the outcome of
this proposal process. Then if that's different, other projects
closely tied to OSM can migrate to the OSM community accepted schema.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging