Hi,
I was actually thinking of the type of battery, i.e. flywheel, LiOn,
etc. Although it would probably also be interesting to figure out a
tagging scheme to classify batteries by type, capacity etc. for the
future. And it's true that :grid, :generator, and :battery as second
namespaces are redundant if the source keys can be restricted to only
being usable if the corresponding infrastructure key is used.
The only issue I see with separating the tagging like this if the
general source of electricity is advertised (e.g. 'renewable' in a
supermarket and you can't determine if that's because they're connected
to the grid or they have a small wind turbine out back..rather unlikely
but still). I think that it's likely easy to tell or would also be
advertised if they had a local generator. Or perhaps would then have to
be left untagged.
If you'd like to add such a table to the wiki, feel free! :)
Best regards,
Lukas
On 15.11.20 01:49, François Lacombe wrote:
Lukas,
Le sam. 14 nov. 2020 à 21:00, Lukas Richert <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> a écrit :
Hi François,
I do actually like the word input for generator and have been
thinking that 'battery:origin' makes no sense either to specify
the type of origin. Keys such as 'electricity:grid:origin=*',
'electricity:generator:input=*', and 'electricity:battery:type=*'
would be more distinct and would separate them. My only problem
with that is that the wikipage would probably need a flowchart to
explain the tagging :/ What do you think?
That's an interesting point.
Do you mean electricity:battery:type should refer to the source of
electricity that feeds the battery?
Let's keep in mind that batteries are probably charged with the same
electricity used in place.
It won't change anything regarding origin or local supply source
quality (electricity won't become greener).
I think electricity:origin is enough, no need to add :grid inside but
only restrict its usage with electricity:grid=yes, for sake of simplicity.
With a simpler origin definition, a table would be enough.
A table similar to Infrastructure table could be completed to give the
applicable tagging suitable for each Infrastructure situation
Let me know how do you feel and I could try to propose something for
this table
All the best
François
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
