On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 2:25 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> > - Why hazard:animal and hazard:species is needed instead of animal and > species? > > I initially had it as just animal and species as you suggest. However, for hazards along a stretch of road (for example, "moose crossing next 5 miles"), you would end up tagging a way with animal=moose. This creates ambiguity in the tagging as to whether the road is *for* moose or contains a *moose hazard*. Thus, I invented hazard:animal to explicitly draw a distinction.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
