Dec 13, 2020, 18:46 by tomasstrau...@gmail.com: Please first stop quoting me in way that presents your statements under my autorship > 2020-12-13, sk, 19:18 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging rašė: > Mateusz, can you point out which of my claims is a lie? > "iD coders decided to skip standard IT processes of product development (or were not familiar with the basics of IT)" ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "coders of iD decided to lie to the users that landuse=reservoir is deprecated which it never was" It is deprecated by 2011 proposal, seehttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details#Deprecation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > I didn't say iD invented duplicate schema, I said that schema was > lying dead until iD decided to introduce it as the only way to tag > water, introduction "launched" new water schema adding any > considerable usage (as it was the only option for iD mappers). > OK, this one was based on miscommunication. > Introducing duplicate and unused schema (especially as the only > option) is not a good IT decision > It was not an unused schema. > usage/requirements must lead technical decisions. That is IT BASICS. > It was not an unused schema and it was proposed, approved and used before iD started using it and later aggressively promoting it. > and introduced > >> water=reservoir as the only way to tag, all this at the time when >> water=reservoir usage was close to zero! >> >> See https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/water=reservoir#chronology >> >> Usage in January 2019 was about 200 000 already. >> >> "water=reservoir usage was close to zero" is untrue >> > > Key word "introduced" so it is 2012, not 2019. > water=reservoir usage in 2012 is close to zero. > Then iD followed a fresh approved proposal, so relatively low usage is not surprising. Though it is a rare case when I encounter complaint about iD developers following outcome of a proposal process. >> It is deprecated by 2011 proposal, see >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details#Deprecation >> > > The author of this proposal agreed that standard water schema is NOT > deprecated. > It is not changing that this vote deprecated landuse=reservoir. Maybe it is a bad decision that should be ignored, but it is not changing that deprecation happened. > And a few people voting in wiki cannot deprecate a tag. > That is one of methods to deprecate tag, even if you dislike it.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
