2020-12-13, sk, 20:41 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging rašė: > Following outcome of approved proposal that you dislike > is not indicator of not following > standard IT processes of product development.
Following some wiki page (which states that landuse=reservoir is not deprecated) written by one person and voted by few rather than de facto situation in other editors and database is huge problem with analysis. In case of iD it is even worse - it shows coders of iD did not want to give a tool, but rather to make influence which they continue to do quite openly, especially with a tactic of "upgrade tags". Compare that to JOSM - which is democratic, follows OSM principle of freedom and lets us - mappers - choose. Both schemas are mostly identical in what classes of object can be mapped. 1. water=reservoir benefit could have been on coding side: having natural=water as an "umbrella" tag but it did not work out that way (so I do not know what is a perceived advantage now?) 2. landuse=reservoir benefit is GIS/Cartographic: we must indicate if it is a natural or man made waterbody. Now you decide which is more important to openstreetMAP. -- Tomas _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
