On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, James Strachan wrote: > > Good idea, but we already have a tag library in taglibs names 'SQL'. > > Whoops - well spotted Morgan ;-) > > The existing SQL Tag library is an implementation of the SQL tags discussed > in the JSP spec. It looks like it hasn't been worked on for over a year. > I'd vote for renaming the old one ... it was added simply to kick start the taglibs project. "SQL" is a name better applied to the current JDBC tags. > Maybe we could rename that one as something like "JSP Spec SQL Taglib" or > something, to highlight the fact its more for demonstration purposes rather > than as the preferred taglibs library for working with SQL? > > It might be confusing for developers seeing 'DB Tags' and 'SQL Tags'. > > James > Craig
- [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change James Strachan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change James Strachan
- RE: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Ignacio J. Ortega
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Pierre Delisle
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change James Strachan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Pierre Delisle
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change James Strachan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Joseph B. Ottinger
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re[2]: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Dylan Parker
