"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, James Strachan wrote:
>
> > > Good idea, but we already have a tag library in taglibs names 'SQL'.
> >
> > Whoops - well spotted Morgan ;-)
> >
> > The existing SQL Tag library is an implementation of the SQL tags discussed
> > in the JSP spec. It looks like it hasn't been worked on for over a year.
> >
>
> I'd vote for renaming the old one ... it was added simply to kick start
> the taglibs project. "SQL" is a name better applied to the current JDBC
> tags.
+1 for renaming old one
+1 for sql for Morgan's taglib
-- Pierre
- [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change James Strachan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change James Strachan
- RE: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Ignacio J. Ortega
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Pierre Delisle
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change James Strachan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Pierre Delisle
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change James Strachan
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Joseph B. Ottinger
- Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re[2]: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Dylan Parker
- Re: Re[2]: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Morgan Delagrange
- Re: Re[2]: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change Craig R. McClanahan
