+1 for both, lets doit.
Morgan Delagrange wrote:
>
> OK, let's split this into two votes. I'm:
>
> +1
>
> for renaming JDBC to "DBTags", and:
>
> +1
>
> for renaming SQL to "SQL Sample Taglib" and moving it to the
> "UNSUPPORTED" state per the prospective Taglibs release rules, as soon as
> the news portion of the site goes live. At that point, we should probably
> post a single binary for SQL and remove it from the daily builds.
>
> - Morgan
>
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, James Strachan wrote:
> >
> > > > Good idea, but we already have a tag library in taglibs names 'SQL'.
> > >
> > > Whoops - well spotted Morgan ;-)
> > >
> > > The existing SQL Tag library is an implementation of the SQL tags discussed
> > > in the JSP spec. It looks like it hasn't been worked on for over a year.
> > >
> >
> > I'd vote for renaming the old one ... it was added simply to kick start
> > the taglibs project. "SQL" is a name better applied to the current JDBC
> > tags.
> >
> > > Maybe we could rename that one as something like "JSP Spec SQL Taglib" or
> > > something, to highlight the fact its more for demonstration purposes rather
> > > than as the preferred taglibs library for working with SQL?
> > >
> > > It might be confusing for developers seeing 'DB Tags' and 'SQL Tags'.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Glenn Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] | /* Spelin donut madder |
MOREnet System Programming | * if iz ina coment. |
Missouri Research and Education Network | */ |
----------------------------------------------------------------------
