I think you'll like the options on this tag library.  I think I probably
will contribute a new revision next week (assuming, of course, that Craig
and Ignacio will have me as a committer :).  It's mainly Rod Waldhoff's
work, although I think I made some additions as well, and I'll probably
make a few more tweaks over the weekend.

If I do contribute it, it will probably constitute a "revolution" and not
an evolution.  Therefore, I'll probably have to place it on a branch until we
perform our first "official" releases.  I will probably put it on the
"rel2" branch, because that seems consistent with the prospective release
rules.

- Morgan

On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Dylan Parker wrote:

> Oh please oh please.
> 
> I've hacked away at a copy to get it to do some caching and a few
> other things... but I would like to take a good look at an XSL taglib
> that has 'matured' in production/use somewhere.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dylan Parker
> 
> Friday, April 27, 2001, 10:58:27 AM, you wrote:
> 
> > Maybe I can help Craig and Ignacio out there.  :)  We have a pretty good
> > XSL tag library here.  I'll see if it makes sense to merge it into
> > Taglibs.
> 
> > - Morgan
> 
> 
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Joseph B. Ottinger wrote:
> 
> >> Does this mean that jakarta's excuse for xsl taglibs goes into the same bin?
> >> :)
> >> 
> >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 05:58:42PM +0200, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
> >> > I think it's the moment to get rid of the SQL taglib...having JDBC
> >> > taglib released i think the "official" SQL taglibs from jakarta should
> >> > be yours...is awesome and deserves the name..for me send actual SQL
> >> > taglib can go to the wastebasket without any pain.. sigh..
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > Saludos ,
> >> > Ignacio J. Ortega
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > > -----Mensaje original-----
> >> > > De: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >> > > Enviado el: viernes 27 de abril de 2001 17:29
> >> > > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James Strachan
> >> > > Asunto: Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > Good idea, but we already have a tag library in taglibs names 'SQL'.
> >> > > 
> >> > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, James Strachan wrote:
> >> > > 
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > > I would like to change the name of the JDBC tag library.  
> >> > > JDBC is a
> >> > > > > registered trademark of Sun, and technically it cannot be 
> >> > > used within a
> >> > > > > product name.  I am:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >   +1
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > for changing the name of the tag library to 'DBTags', but 
> >> > > maintaining the
> >> > > > > current packaging.
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > Just a suggestion - how about calling them "SQL Tags" then 
> >> > > it would match
> >> > > > your <sql:query/> style prefix?
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > James
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > _________________________________________________________
> >> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> >> > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >> > > > 
> >> > > > 
> >> > > 
> >> > > 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> Joseph B. Ottinger                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> http://epesh.com/                             IT Consultant
> >> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to