On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
> I think you'll like the options on this tag library. I think I probably
> will contribute a new revision next week (assuming, of course, that Craig
> and Ignacio will have me as a committer :). It's mainly Rod Waldhoff's
> work, although I think I made some additions as well, and I'll probably
> make a few more tweaks over the weekend.
>
> If I do contribute it, it will probably constitute a "revolution" and not
> an evolution. Therefore, I'll probably have to place it on a branch until we
> perform our first "official" releases. I will probably put it on the
> "rel2" branch, because that seems consistent with the prospective release
> rules.
>
I would love to see this, and/or to have Pierre's "iotransformer" concept
include built-in support for XSLT transformations.
The original tag was done as part of an effort to "kick start" taglibs.
If you guys can make it obsolete by providing better tags, well, that just
means I get a more powerful library for *me* to use (in other words, the
kick start worked :-).
> - Morgan
>
Craig
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Dylan Parker wrote:
>
> > Oh please oh please.
> >
> > I've hacked away at a copy to get it to do some caching and a few
> > other things... but I would like to take a good look at an XSL taglib
> > that has 'matured' in production/use somewhere.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dylan Parker
> >
> > Friday, April 27, 2001, 10:58:27 AM, you wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe I can help Craig and Ignacio out there. :) We have a pretty good
> > > XSL tag library here. I'll see if it makes sense to merge it into
> > > Taglibs.
> >
> > > - Morgan
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Joseph B. Ottinger wrote:
> >
> > >> Does this mean that jakarta's excuse for xsl taglibs goes into the same bin?
> > >> :)
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 05:58:42PM +0200, Ignacio J. Ortega wrote:
> > >> > I think it's the moment to get rid of the SQL taglib...having JDBC
> > >> > taglib released i think the "official" SQL taglibs from jakarta should
> > >> > be yours...is awesome and deserves the name..for me send actual SQL
> > >> > taglib can go to the wastebasket without any pain.. sigh..
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Saludos ,
> > >> > Ignacio J. Ortega
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > > -----Mensaje original-----
> > >> > > De: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >> > > Enviado el: viernes 27 de abril de 2001 17:29
> > >> > > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; James Strachan
> > >> > > Asunto: Re: [VOTE] JDBC tag library name change
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Good idea, but we already have a tag library in taglibs names 'SQL'.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, James Strachan wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I would like to change the name of the JDBC tag library.
> > >> > > JDBC is a
> > >> > > > > registered trademark of Sun, and technically it cannot be
> > >> > > used within a
> > >> > > > > product name. I am:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > +1
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > for changing the name of the tag library to 'DBTags', but
> > >> > > maintaining the
> > >> > > > > current packaging.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Just a suggestion - how about calling them "SQL Tags" then
> > >> > > it would match
> > >> > > > your <sql:query/> style prefix?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > James
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > _________________________________________________________
> > >> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > >> > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> > >> Joseph B. Ottinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> http://epesh.com/ IT Consultant
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
