Hi, Alessandro Grassi wrote (15 Dec 2012 15:09:13 GMT) : > Ok, I removed that last part from the patch. The upstream mantainer > will decide what's best :)
Did you already send this patch to them, by the way? (If not, I encourage you to do so :) >> So, the question now becomes: how does the stored history affect the >> behaviour of Minitube? Does it affect this behaviour in any way that >> could be observable on the network, or on the YouTube / Google / 3rd >> party servers that are reached? (I guess, and hope, the answers will >> unanimously be "no", but this is what should be checked.) > I searched for "recent" in the source files and didn't find anything > suspicious. There is code to save recent keywords, load them, clear > them with a button, but they shouldn't affect the behaviour in any > way. I hope someone else can confirm! Great! How about searching the source for code that accesses the history (probably basing the search on the place / name of the files / storage methods that contain the history) too? This code may, or may not, contain the "recent" word. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
