intrigeri: > Hi, > > we've been asked privately to include a text web browser (lynx, > w3m...) in Tails. I personally don't think the limited usecase is > worth the time we would have to spend to make sure this additional > HTTP client doesn't leak what it should not, so IMHO this is a no. > Also, such clients are generally small enough that someone who > really wants to use them (and take the risk / responsibility) can > install it themselves. > > Other thoughts? > > Cheers,
Hi! I have an item on my personal todo list to ask on tor-talk if there are ANY Tor-safe alternatives to Tor Browser that can be configured with few/acceptable/none linking/fingerprinting issues. Even (and also) a text only, html only, no javascript browser would be a real enrichment. For ease of use, I'd prefer a graphical, non-text one (none, that works in console and doesn't easily support copy and paste). A smaller attack surface would be worth it. The more paranoid ones will love you for having a "higher security browser". Cheers! adrelanos _______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
