On 24/03/13 11:14, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > > we've been asked privately to include a text web browser (lynx, > w3m...) in Tails. I personally don't think the limited usecase is > worth the time we would have to spend to make sure this additional > HTTP client doesn't leak what it should not, so IMHO this is a no. > Also, such clients are generally small enough that someone who really > wants to use them (and take the risk / responsibility) can install > it themselves.
Same here.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tails-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
