On Tue, 12 Aug 2014 21:58:42 +0000 (UTC) intrigeri <[email protected]> wrote:
> Huck Toohey wrote (12 Aug 2014 21:42:52 GMT) : > > 2) I have seen similar behavior as is described here, only when I > > have inadvertently input my bridge relays in an incorrect format. > > They need to be input as > > transport IP:port > > e.g.: > > obfs3 127.127.127.255:31415 > > (one per line) > > > On occasion I've inadvertently prepended the string "bridge " or > > appended the server's fingerprint as I would with TBB. The Tor > > config dialogue in Tails (what to call this? the dialogue after the > > greeter, when direct connect is not selected) appears to require > > transport IP:port and only transport IP:port, one per line. > > I'm curious about it. We use the same software to configure Tor in > Tails, as is used in the TBB: Tor Launcher. If it doesn't behave the > same in Tails as in the TBB, we might have a bug here. I did not see what's reported here at all. I tested this for the first time earlier today. I simply copy & pasted the three returned bridges *directly* from the tor bridges page...and Tor connected. -- GPG ID: 0x5BF72F42D0952C5A Fingerprint: BD12 65FD 4954 C40A EBCB F5D7 5BF7 2F42 D095 2C5A
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ tails-support mailing list [email protected] https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-support To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to [email protected].
