On 8 June 2010 13:31, Neil Penman <ianaf4...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > Only the vast majority of these were not sourced from Nearmap (except in some > of the country areas not previously covered by Yahoo). They may have been > updated by somebody using nearmap imagery, mostly trivial changes, but they > would have been originally created via survey or from Yahoo. Certainly names > would not have been sourced from nearmap. Wouldn't it would make more sense > if the source tag was only applied to changesets? Even that is not ideal as > in one changeset multiple sources could be used, ie survey for names, > nearmap for layout.
The vast majority of the information I personally sourced as nearmap has been new content, and not just in regional areas there completely new suburbs that weren't built when yahoo imagery was taken, or I added source:location=* tags, I disagree about only setting source as part of the changeset tags, while nearmap imagery might be used for locations it isn't used for naming etc. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
