Only the vast majority of these were not sourced from Nearmap (except in some of the country areas not previously covered by Yahoo). They may have been updated by somebody using nearmap imagery, mostly trivial changes, but they would have been originally created via survey or from Yahoo. Certainly names would not have been sourced from nearmap. Wouldn't it would make more sense if the source tag was only applied to changesets? Even that is not ideal as in one changeset multiple sources could be used, ie survey for names, nearmap for layout.
--- On Mon, 7/6/10, Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> wrote: From: Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [talk-au] The nearmap effect To: [email protected] Received: Monday, 7 June, 2010, 6:44 PM On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:45:20 +1000 John Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7 June 2010 15:41, Steve Bennett <[email protected]> wrote: > > http://www.itoworld.com/product/osm/map?colour=table&style=_default_osm_tags&area=4687:0&sort=total-&show=key_values:8 > > > > I only just discovered ItoWorld, heh. > > I think Ross reported the other week about almost 100,000 objects in > OSM tagged with Nearmap as the source. Currently from tagwatch nodes 16274 ways 119647 relations 154 -- Cheers Ross _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
