> On 31 August 2010 19:16, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:14 PM, John Smith <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> URL? > > > > http://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/18/239684/158567.png > > I was after the perm link > (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-35.290188&lon=149.156265&zoom=18&layers=M) > > As for the double names, you don't need a node + polygon/multipolygon > with the same name, otherwise they both render. To fix it, all you > have to do is shift any additional tags to the way and delete the > node.
That's what we've been discussing but it's also a good idea to make sure you don't translate incorrect information like source tags. Additionally just don't delete 300 or so nodes without seeing if it's by general agreement rather than just announcing that you've done it. Not that you'd do anything like that, John :) Personally I'd rather see the node left with name address and all the tags and the area just marked with the appropriate type and source. eg for the "Campbell Primary School" the node has: amenity=school name=Campbell Primary School addr:city=Canberra ... source=gov.au and the area tagged as amenity=school source=whatever Then the names will not double render but the name is rendered in an appropriate position. It's not really practical for suburb relations but most have a place= node anyway. Cheers Ross > Another good example of names being rendered is on suburb/postcode > multipolygons being rendered and putting the name of the > suburb/postcode in the middle of no where. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
