On 06/04/2011, at 10:58 PM, Richard Weait wrote: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:50 AM, James Livingston <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Time to go read the CTs again... > > That's one of the sections of v1 that has been clarified in v1.2.4. > Have a look. > http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms
Ah, we're going to enforce a Accept/Decline choice in a few days to continue, but the CTs currently shown are outdated? I'd assumed the CTs that you got shown a few days before it got enforced would be the latest ones :) > If you contribute Contents, You are indicating that, as far as You know, You > have the right to authorize OSMF to use and distribute those Contents under > our current licence terms .. > OSMF agrees that it may only use or sub-license Your Contents as part of a > database and only under the terms of one or more of the following licences: > ... I'll probably send this question to legal-talk when I get home, that sounds like it lets you upload data which is compatible with the current license but will need to be removed under a relicensing. Wasn't the whole point of the CTs that we could do relicensing (including CC-BY-SA to ODbL) without getting everyone's pemission? -- James _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
