On 8 April 2011 10:06, Ben Last <[email protected]> wrote: > > To be clear; we're not "refusing" anything - our licence has remained the > same since we launched, and we haven't changed it. The new OSM CTs are > incompatible with it.
Several people have made similar comments, they looked into the license OSM-F was publishing their work under and was happy that it was strong copyleft, and that is the only reason they submitted contributions to OSM-F, otherwise we might as well all be working for google for free, especially since they have better aerial imagery than Bing and yahoo etc... _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
