On 10 April 2011 15:29, 4x4falcon <[email protected]> wrote: > At the moment I'm tending to fosm.org as it seems the most compatible with > what I've been doing. > > Having said that I'm still watching commonmap.org etc as well.
Well from a license point of view, all commonmap data should be usable for fosm.org too, there is already some code to handle osm.org v fosm.org conflicts so I can only assume this could be expanded for commonmap as well. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
