[snip] > > > It's starting to become painfully obvious that OSM-F wouldn't be able > to organise a piss up in a brewery, and there seems to be little or no > chance that they can actually pull off the license change over in > some kind of demotactic, moral and smooth change over so I'm basically > writing them off for all future edits as a complete waste of time. > > A couple of us are toying about with what to do next, fosm.org seems > the most suitable at present since the idea is to continue on with > CC-by-SA licenses, although there is still debate over which CC-by-SA > license due to issues with the European Database Directive, but that > doesn't have any effect on us in Australia until and unless the > Australian government decides to do something similar if Telstra et al > push now that copyright doesn't protect their data. > > What do others think, or have planned if OSM-F keeps heading into the > lost cause territory? > > I am just starting to investigate/think-about this - I will be looking for something that stays close to the current license. Apart from the legal/ethical issues my biggest concern is compatibility with NearMap and Australian government data.
cheers > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au > -- Franc
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
