On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Anthony <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 19, 2011 7:17 PM, "Grant Slater" <[email protected]> wrote: >> *: Correct me if I am wrong, but the GPL also doesn't have a >> restrictive 'no reverse engineering' clause. > The GPL isn't sold as a license which restricts the use of factual > information obtained from reverse engineering.
LGPL would be a better analogy anyway, and it is clear that LGPL derivatives cannot be released under a less restrictive license, only under a more restrictive one. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
