On 19 December 2011 11:50, Ross Scanlon <[email protected]> wrote:
> As I said and it's been said many times before other items should not be > attached to boundaries. > If a boundary IS a coastline, sharing a way isn't wrong. Would you really create two ways that are fully coincident? There is details on the wiki about separating the rivers etc from the > boundaries. Look under Australian Tagging Guidelines. > I'm sure I could find another wiki page which says the opposite. The sharing object debate is as old as OSM. As for the relevance to ABS import - if a river location is derived from non-CT data, it should be deleted as it is derived from a work that hasn't been relicenced. This applies whether the river and the boundary share an object or not - makes no difference. Ian.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
