On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Stephen Hope <[email protected]> wrote: > When we first proposed (and started using) the 4wd_only tag, there was a lot > of pushback from people who complained that it was not a verifiable tag. > Track type had the same response. We were able to show them that there are > signs all over Australia that say 4WD only at the start of a road. I think > you'll get a lot of reaction trying to add levels of 4WD required where > there are no signs to point at. Feel free to advocate it, though, and to > tag that way. If enough people tag things in a certain way, that's the > surest way of setting a standard.
So if there is a sign "4WD only", then we tag it 4wd_only=yes, even if it otherwise it might look like a 2WD road? (That is, the road authority's assessment trumps our own?) Steve _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
