Maybe the issue is that they cannot, in practice, sign every such bush track ?
And I don't want them using my taxes to try ! Nope, I think its up to us to make those decisions. And, dare I say it, apply common sense. David On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:22 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote: > On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Stephen Hope <slh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > When we first proposed (and started using) the 4wd_only tag, there was a lot > > of pushback from people who complained that it was not a verifiable tag. > > Track type had the same response. We were able to show them that there are > > signs all over Australia that say 4WD only at the start of a road. I think > > you'll get a lot of reaction trying to add levels of 4WD required where > > there are no signs to point at. Feel free to advocate it, though, and to > > tag that way. If enough people tag things in a certain way, that's the > > surest way of setting a standard. > > So if there is a sign "4WD only", then we tag it 4wd_only=yes, even if > it otherwise it might look like a 2WD road? (That is, the road > authority's assessment trumps our own?) > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au