Also: clarify explicitly that attribution in the wiki is acceptable to them. On 17/09/2013 6:43 PM, "Daniel O'Connor" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would send them the odbl licence and position it as 'is this ok with > your open government stance? ' > > neatly avoids cc by confusion, gives them an attitude to address, and > likely ends up with 'let it be free' > On 17/09/2013 4:53 PM, "Li Xia" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Gday everyone, >> >> I've been talking to DSE about importing vicmap data into OSM under the >> CC license. Got this reply today... >> >> "The Creative Commons licence requires you to Attribute the work/data as >> being Vicmap Data. We would like to sit down with you at some stage in >> early October and discuss the inclusion of Vicmap into OSM.? >> >> I'm not a legal buff, but if someone is, would you like to join me for >> this meeting? >> >> Li. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-au mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au >> >>
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
