On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Nick Hocking <[email protected]>wrote:
> Steve wrote > > "IMHO some small scale imports may be useful, but from my comparisons, the > VicMap data is not necessarily "better" than OSM. It often has stuff OSM > doesn't, but sometimes that includes spurious stuff like roads that no > longer exist, never did, etc." > > > Thanks Steve, > > As far as importing goes, I'm only talking about house numbers (since they > are so hard to collect by survey). > Yeah, house numbers are probably a really good example where in most places we have zero data. > I definitely think that road names must NOT be imported but added > individually, where current osm data and bing imagery indicate that there > really is a road (currently OSM unamed) there. > > Yeah. I'm still deciding what to do about places where Vicmap shows a track in the bush that can't be seen on any imagery - probably because the vegetation is too dense. Steve
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
