On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 18:02 +1000, Steve Bennett wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Nick Hocking > <nick.hock...@gmail.com>
> ....(sensible statements about house numbers).... > I definitely think that road names must NOT be imported but > added individually, where current osm data and bing imagery > indicate that there really is a road (currently OSM unamed) > there. > Yeah. I'm still deciding what to do about places where Vicmap shows a > track in the bush that can't be seen on any imagery - probably because > the vegetation is too dense. > Guys, can I respectfully suggest that source=survey ? Vicmaps (and others) sometimes show roads that have been closed, land sold off etc. Those roads will show up in imagery because the car tracks last a long time on the ground. Further, visiting the site can clarify the state and status of a road. Road names on published maps are sometimes wrong, lets not propagate those errors ! Lets restrict mapping via imagery to those situations where survey is not possible. David > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-au mailing list > Talk-au@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
