On 21-Feb-17 06:10 AM, John Henderson wrote:
On 20/02/17 20:49, Warin wrote:
I'd no be worried by 10 m ... the differences are ~100 metres in
places. Might be more in some places too .. have not been measuring
.. just concerned at the differences. It could be as simple as
running off a map and going a bit off the official course as 'it
looks better'.
I mapped the area around Burrinjuck Dam during the last big drought. So
I've got the track going well out into where the water is now, and to
where walkers got on and off the boat at that time.
Looks odd on the hiking map with the dam showing as full, especially at
the southern end, on the Goodradigbee River to the north of Wee Jasper.
There are many tracks that 'go into' lakes Not worried by them.
Here is an example
Way: 285828626 - a track source Bing
If you compare it to the LPI Base map zoomed in to a scale of 100m in
JOSM you will
find that path heading north about halfway along the track.
Around -35.75557/148.16232
I thing the H&H is the path shown on LPI ... not the present OSM shown
route.
If LPI is correct and you followed OSM .. there might be a fair bit of
true bushwalking.
To further confuse things .. Strava shows paths/tracks used in that area
... but not the LPI path nor the OSM H&H trail.
I am inclined to;
map the LPI data .. as the H&H where I think it is appropriate.
map the strava stuff ... as a track.
remove the present OSM H&H where it looks to be replaced by either the
OSM or strava data.
But I am still thinking about it, I don't like removing stuff!
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
