For comparison of the data
I have added;
Way: 475962239 - LPI path - probably H&H
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475962239#map=16/-35.6419/148.2472
Way 475966488 - Strava path - probably H&H
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/475966488#map=16/-35.6419/148.2472
OSM H&H presently in that area;
Way 285630127 and Way: 248788644 + many others
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285630127#map=16/-35.6419/148.2472
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248788644#map=16/-35.6419/148.2472
I am inclined to go with the strava as that has more than one
source/person (I hope). Where that is lacking then the LIP data.
I am depreciating the present OSM data as it comes from one person and
no source is stated ..
I think it is an indication - better than a total lack of data, but
there are now better sources.
-------------------------
I think leaving all 3 is not helpful.
But what to remove and and why is a judgement call that would be made
from one area to another.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
