Yes, good work getting the waiver. I would also agree not to include electoral boundaries. And my primary interest would also be Tasmania.
The state (and probably more broadly) already has a comprehensive naming of localities and suburbs from surveys, but mostly from the GeoScience Australia place names dataset. I would think that when integrating PSMA boundaries, it would be important to preserve these place nodes which more accurately pinpoint the locations of smaller communities (even if it is only a cluster of a few homes), which would not necessarily be the centroid of the relation. And just hand-waving some possible scenario/solution: nodes of place=hamlet or lower would be integrated with the PSMA locality region. The node would be take role:label in the relation. The relation would place=hamlet as well as boundary=admin?
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
