I didn’t know what to make of QLD, but I’ve just found this definition which suggests that the OSM coastline should be sufficient: http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/viewMetadataDetails.page?uuid=%7B3F3DBD69-647B-4833-B0A5-CC43D5E70699%7D
“For coastal areas other than Brisbane, the LGA comprises the mainland and all islands above their respective sea-shores within the encompassed area.” From: Andrew Davidson<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, 9 October 2018 20:56 To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [talk-au] PSMA Administrative Boundaries On 07/10/18 23:27, Lee Mason wrote: > Nice work on cleaning up the PSMA data, Andrew. It looks a lot easier to > manage for importing now. > > A quick look at the data, and it appears there is some regional/state > variance in the boundaries: > > Some of the WA LGAs extend out to the coastal waters limit. > > VIC LGAs mostly approximate the high tide mark (except around Port > Welshpool) and are shared with the locality boundaries. > > TAS LGAs mostly extend to the low tide mark and are not shared with > locality boundaries. > Weirdly in Queensland, some of the locality and LGA boundaries extend into international waters. They probably need to be cut-off at the coastal water boundary. _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.openstreetmap.org%2Flistinfo%2Ftalk-au&data=02%7C01%7C%7Cfb4031c5544d440913b408d62dcd8908%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636746758117747213&sdata=YU6bIRXejeE5VCmeqRuCLA2uZp2veElbSkrviXQTYUE%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
