On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 02:24, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why it would be irrelevant? > > access tag family is for legal access (with some space for officially > discouraged access), > access=destination is for "transit is illegal", not "local residents > dislike transit traffic". > > OSM is not a place to add a nonexisting ban on transit traffic > Yeah realised this later, see my other post in this thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-November/013188.html, which I suggested motor_vehicle:advisory=destination to tag a suggested or advised but maybe not legally enforceable destination only restriction. On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 01:55, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> wrote: > Is it "local traffic only" as in "resident only" or "no transit"? > > Is permission required to enter this area? > > AFAIK there is no tagging scheme for distinguishing "only with permission > of > homeowner" and "available to all residents of closed community". > It just means this road is indented to be used if you're traveling to somewhere along this road, but not if you're just driving through as a shortcut. It's still public land, not private property.
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
