sorry, yes – it’s lacram_telenav.

 

The changeset that caught my eye is 67193952

 

I just don’t understand what they’re trying to achieve.  There are gazillions 
of such intersections to be done if they head down this path.

 

I see that it is a member of a relation called destination_sign (3286190), 
which has lots of information about the signage on this exit.  Do they need to 
have the motorway_junction tag to record these details about the signage ??  - 
and why wouldn’t they be using destination= ?

 

Ian

 

 

From: Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, 24 February 2020 11:14 AM
To: Ian Steer <[email protected]>
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [talk-au] highway=motorway_junction

 

I don't really see the point of motorway_junction unless that exit has a name 
or number (ref), however it's still valid per the wiki as on nodes at which you 
can exit the highway, I think to avoid putting it on absolutely every 
intersection we should reserve it's use for highway=motorway or trunk/primary 
which have grade separated exits.

 

So based on what you've said, it does sound okay, but if you could link to a 
few changesets that would help?

 

Is that username lacram_telenav instead of lacrom_telenav? Per 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Telenav it looks like they are no longer 
working for Telenav, so if there is an issue or question we'll need to contact 
Telenav at [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
for any questions.

 

On Mon, 24 Feb 2020 at 13:11, Ian Steer <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

lacrom_telenav has been adding highway=motorway_junction tags on exits from 
major roads around Perth – I think to designate destination signs.  It is 
associated with “noref=yes”

 

The wiki says:

 

Use the  <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> 
highway=motorway_junction tag to identify a point along a  
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> highway=* with junction refs 
or names where it is possible to exit the highway onto another road. This is 
usually found along a  <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> 
highway= <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway> motorway, 
but is also applicable to other roads with numbered or named junctions 
including some  <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> highway= 
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk> trunk and  
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> highway= 
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary> primary roads.

 

The instances I have noticed are not on roads with named or numbered exits, 
therefore I am thinking this tag is inappropriate.  (I noticed it because it 
shows-up as an “e” on my GPS – which is a rendering issue I know)

 

The wiki also says:

 

 <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name> name=* for the name of the 
junction or interchange. Do not confuse the name of a junction with the 
destination(s) the junction leads to. In most cases worldwide, sign information 
describes destinations, not the name of the junction or interchange itself. If 
a signpost or indication displays destinations exclusively, this data belongs 
to  <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination> destination=* tags, 
not the  <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name> name=* of the  
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> highway=motorway_junction 
node.

 

I tried messaging this user a week-or-so ago and have had no response.

 

What do people think about this tag?  I don’t know what he is trying to achieve.

 

Ian

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to